Regardless of whether material is collected from living or dead patients, they (family or guardian if the deceased has not made a pre-mortem decision) must have given prior written consent. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. But what I don't understand is the difference between editorial decision started and manuscipt under consideration. Papers will be accepted for review only if they are not under consideration by another journal. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. You can access your manuscript via the 'Live Manuscript' folder at any time during the editorial process. , . Available from: www.cancer.org. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Authors will be asked to resolve the dispute themselves. Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. With them, we emphasize our interest in expanding our presence in biotechnology research. Most institutions will have specific policies on this subject. Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Interests within the last 3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing the work for submission) should be reported. Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. No funds, grants, or other support was received. before being sent to te reviewers an editor usually has a quick look at your paper - to see if you meet all the criteria of the journal (e.g. All abbreviations should be fully defined in the text. In case of data acquired via a biobank/biorepository, it is possible they apply a broad consent which allows research participants to consent to a broad range of uses of their data and samples which is regarded by research ethics committees as specific enough to be considered informed. All authors are requested to make sure that all data and materials as well as software application or custom code support their published claims and comply with field standards. If the manuscript status has been showing under consideration for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling (self-plagiarism). More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. Editorial Open Access 03 Feb 2023. . For vector graphics, the preferred format is EPS; for halftones, please use TIFF format. Presenting your work in a well-structured manuscript and in well-written English gives it its best chance for editors and reviewers to understand it and evaluate it fairly. Franks, F. (1993) Protein Biotechnology, 2nd ed., Humana, Totowa, NJ. Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. This step will alert authors to possible problems with the cell line and may save considerable time and effort. The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses [Handbook]. Now (4 days after the initial submission), it is now under the status of "Editorial Decision Started". To obtain If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Examples of statements to be used when funding has been received: Examples of statements to be used when there is no funding: Examples of statements to be used when there are interests to declare: Non-financial interests: Author C is an unpaid member of committee Z. ), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. These submissions are subject to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and . Type on separate pages. ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors, Transparency in authors contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018. For example www.clinicaltrials.gov or any of the primary registries that participate in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. 3. To add lettering, it is best to use Helvetica or Arial (sans serif fonts). Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. on 17 Jun, 2022, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Cationic, often amphiphilic, peptides with antimicrobial . Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their country. provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. Cactus Communications. In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers, biometrical characteristics (such as facial features, fingerprint, writing style, voice pattern, DNA or other distinguishing characteristic) and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scholarly purposes and the participant (or parent/guardian if the participant is a minor or incapable or legal representative) gave written informed consent for publication. //--> Hamilton Funeral Home Plattsburgh Ny, How Many Actors On Yellowstone Are Real Cowboys, What Is A Swill Bucket In Animal Farm, Best Mm2 Player Leaderboard, Maryborough Advertiser Death Notices Today, Articles M