Additionally, while the decisions of one federal district court certainly do not amount to precedent, the type of remedies sought appears to matter. With its advanced infrastructure, industry leading operational efficiencies, proven strategy of brands, and cultural influence, The Parent Company is expected to be best positioned for the inevitable end of cannabis prohibition in the United States., Steve Allan, who will become The Parent Companys CEO following closing of the Transaction, said: In addition to building the most influential portfolio of cannabis and hemp brands in the world, The Parent Companys vertical operational platform has been designed for growth and future mergers and acquisitions, forging a path to redefine the cannabis industry in California.. mg Magazine. 19-35952 | 2019-11-14, U.S. District Courts | Contract | TheKIVAruling suggests a hostility, at least on the part of one federal court, toward trademark claims based on conduct that is unlawful under federal law. Polestar says it willhit public markets next quarter via areverse merger with Gores Guggenheim, Inc (NASDAQ:GGPI). TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Subversive Capital Acquisition Corp. (NEO: SVC.A.U, SVC.WT.U; OTCQX: SBVCF) ("SCAC"), a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), today announced it has entered into definitive transaction agreements (the Agreements) with global icon, entrepreneur and MONOGRAM founder, Shawn JAY-Z Carter, entertainment powerhouse Roc Nation, CMG Partners Inc. (Caliva), Californias most trusted cannabis brand and leading direct-to-consumer platform, and Left Coast Ventures, Inc. (Left Coast Ventures), a predominant cannabis and hemp company with low-cost manufacturing and a diversified portfolio of brands, to form TPCO Holding Corp. (The Parent Company) (the Transaction). For the second time in recent months, Delawares Chancery Court has ruled that shareholders can sue board members for breaching their duties in a de-SPAC deal. This dismissal would not be precedential, but it would send a strong signal about how federal courts will treat contracts concerning cannabis. The court ruled that even though the contracts object was marijuana and the contract was thus void and unenforceable, it had still beenformed. It is not necessarily surprising that a federal judge would have this opinion, but what is notable is that we are getting these opinions in 2019, many years after cannabis was legalized. In addition, the Caliva shareholders may receive the following additional consideration post-closing: Pursuant to the terms of the definitive transaction agreement with respect to Left Coast Ventures (the LCV Agreement), SCAC will acquire Left Coast Ventures by merging such entity with and into a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of SCAC, with Left Coast Ventures continuing as the surviving entity and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of SCAC (the LCV Transaction). Subversive Capital will then acquire both Caliva and Left Coast Ventures for $282.9 million and $142.2 million, respectively. Left Coast Ventures | LinkedIn A cannabis companys investors sued its private equity backers in Delaware, claiming Fireman Capital Partners LLC made an egregious, self-interested cash grab by diluting stock just before a blank check company acquired it and went into business with hip hop mogul Jay-Z. Cannabis plants grow in the greenhouse at the MG Health Ltd. growing facility in the South African country of Lesotho. Investors in the private placement commitments received to date include Fireman Capital Partners, Tuatara Capital, and Subversive Capital, the largest investors in Caliva and Left Coast Ventures, as well as Roc Nation artists Rihanna, Yo Gotti, and Meek Mill. This case, like the contract dispute cases discussed above, demonstrates legal obligations may not simply be ignored on the grounds they concern marijuana. Although Kiva Health initiated the lawsuit, KBI countered with its own claims, among them that KIVA Healths registered trademark should be canceled and, under the federal Lanham Act, KIVA Health actually infringed KBIs marks, which had been used before KIVA Healths. Plaintiff, John Joseph Smith, individually and on behalf of entities he controls, alleges that Defendants, Thomas M. Scott, CA Ventures, LLC, and a number of other related entities formed by Scott and CA VenturesCA Ventures (the Subsidiary LLCs), terminated him from his employment with CA Ventures without cause, but nevertheless stripped him As experienced trial lawyers who have litigated civil actions involving a number of different industries and who have focused on advising clients with a broad range of cannabis-related interests, we have set forth below examples of the intersection between civil litigation and cannabis, with a focus on tips for planning ahead to avoid or resolve quickly an otherwise resource-draining civil action. DocketDocket Entry: Order:; Event Type: Event; Comments: ON VERIFIED MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. InMann v. Gullickson, a company claimed it was due money under an agreement pursuant to which it provided consulting services to marijuana businesses. In a ruling issued late last year, the court explained "[t]o hold that KBIs prior use of the KIVA mark on a product that is illegal under federal law is a legitimate defense to KHBs federal trademark would put the government in the anomalous position of extending the benefits of trademark protection to a seller based upon actions the seller took in violation of that governments own laws." (In a similar case,Woodstock Ventures LC, et al. Based on sources and uses of capital, SCAC will have sufficient cash to satisfy the Transaction's closing conditions. It would be a strong signal for a second case to be dismissed on unenforceability in a few months, and both here in Western Washington, which has had state-legal cannabis for seven years now. Finally, deals among businesses are generally governed by agreements; as such, in these types of situations, companies are given the opportunity to take prophylactic measures (such as crafting provisions on dispute resolution, choice of law, and venue) that are unavailable in the absence of a contractual relationship. PLANT LIFE APOTHECARY LLC ET AL VS LEFT COAST VENTURES, INC. Infinity Global Consulting Group, Inc. et al v. Tilray, Inc. et al, Left Coast Ventures, Inc. v. Brightstar LLC, INFINITY GLOBAL CONSULTING GROUP INC. By Rachel Stone (December 9, 2019, 4:55 PM EST) -- A Canadian cannabis company hatched a plot to bankrupt a company made famous on ABC's "Shark Tank" so it could cheaply take over the company's line of all-natural body care products, according to a $150 million derivative lawsuit removed to Florida federal court. U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more. investor@subversivecapital.com, Nike Communications Subversive Capital Sponsor LLC (the Sponsor) has agreed to potentially forfeiting up to approximately 5.7 million SCAC Common Shares (subject to certain reductions), whereby one-third of such SCAC Common Shares will cease to be subject to forfeiture if the VWAP of SCAC Common Shares reaches $13.00, $17.00 and $21.00, respectively, within three years of closing of the Transaction. If you do not agree with these terms, then do not use our website and/or services. According to the ruling shared by Zurn, Left Coast shareholders have the ability to file direct claims against private equity fund Fireman Capital Partners LLC and three Left Coast board members affiliated with the fund, including director Dan Fireman. Finally, one place to get all the court documents we need. Jay-Z backed cannabis company faces lawsuit following court Stikeman Elliot LLP is acting as legal counsel to Canaccord Genuity Corp. UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. WebThey have been selected based on multiple factors including the salience of the alleged abuse, the relevance and nature of the litigation strategy, and the potential for setting - Leland Hensch, CEO of SCAC In connection with the consummation of the LCV Transaction, SCAC has also agreed to repay in full certain promissory notes of LCV for an aggregate amount equal to $15.0 million (the LCV Note Repayment) which LCV Note Repayment will adjust the consideration paid to Left Coast Ventures shareholders on closing. The privately held company is known to have been acquired last year by Subversive Capital Acquisition. The lawsuit concerns Left Coasts merger with Subversive Capital Acquisition Company, a special purpose acquisition company that acquired another cannabis company, Jay-Z affiliate Caliva, at around the same AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news. However, the court disagreed, holding that although marijuana is illegal under the CSA, Arizona (where the case was pending) had passed a medical marijuana law and the Department of Justice was prohibited from prosecuting individuals compliant with state medical marijuana laws. Reflecting yet another sort of consumer-type action, a number of CBD companies selling their products online have been sued in putative class actions under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on the grounds their websites are not accessible to blind customers. Calivas plant-based solutions serve over 1 million customers and are designed to fit any lifestyle. The affiliate of Mr. Carter will enter into a lock-up agreement upon closing of the Transaction restricting sales of SCAC Common Shares for six months after the closing of the Transaction. Left Coast Ventures Former Investors. Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.Youll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Participants increasingly are engaged in civil litigation involving 1) consumer-oriented claims, such as product liability, personal injury, and consumer fraud; 2) commercial disagreements, such as claims for breach of contract in consulting agreements, insurance policies, or supply agreements; 3) partnership claims, such as disputes over ownership interests and performance payouts; 4) intellectual property claims, such as trademark infringement or trade secret/non-compete violations; and 5) employment-related claims, such as harassment, workers compensation, and wage-related claims. Cases involving stockholder rights and actions (direct and derivative actions), Infinity Global Consulting Group, Inc. et al v. Left Coast Ventures, Inc. et al, (#1) Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond SCACs control, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those that are disclosed in or implied by such forward-looking information. These acquisitions together constitute SCACs Case law has shown courts willingness tosua sponteconsider the issue of federal illegality in determining whether consideration of the matter is proper. Concurrently with entering into the Caliva Agreement and the LCV Agreement, certain shareholders of Caliva and LCV entered into support and lock-up agreements pursuant to which such holders agreed to support the Caliva Transaction and the LCV Transaction, respectively, and agreed not to sell any SCAC Common Shares received under the Caliva Agreement or LCV Agreement, as applicable, for six months after the closing of the Transaction. WebManufacturing. - Desiree Perez, CEO of ROC NATION To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: [Ongoing] Read Latest COVID-19 Guidance, All Aspects, [Hot Topic] Environmental, Social & Governance. (Reuters) - Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay about $1 billion to resolve the bulk of lawsuits claiming the company sold defective metal-on-metal hip implants that Quinn Emanuel Cannabis Litigation Practice Alert: Recent Stock Drop Securities Actions in the Cannabis Industry, Federal Court Rejects Challenge To Arbitrability Of Cannabis Disputes, Recent Trends in Cannabis Patent Litigation From the QE Cannabis Industry Litigation Group, Insurance RecoveryObtaining Releaf for the Cannabis Industry, SEC Division of Examinations 2023 Priorities. Holding. On 12/14/2020 PLANT LIFE APOTHECARY LLC filed an Other lawsuit against LEFT COAST VENTURES, INC. UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. They also normally involve novel questions of statutory and constitutional interpretation. Judith Schvimmer - General Counsel, Corporate Secretary - LinkedIn SCAC is the largest SPAC in both cannabis and Canadian history and will seek to redefine the industry with a mission to both consolidate the California cannabis market and create an impactful global company. Pursuant to the terms of the binding heads of terms agreement (the Roc Agreement) with respect to Roc Nation, LLC (Roc Nation), The Parent Company will become Roc Nations Official Cannabis Partner, Roc Nation will provide The Parent Company with special access and rights with respect to Roc Nations roster of artists and athletes and Roc Nation will promote The Parent Companys brand portfolio and provide various services specifically described therein. DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Founded by Michael Auerbach and led by Chief Executive Officer, Leland Hensch, SCAC is dedicated to investing in radical companies whose core missions subvert the status quo. Founded in 2015, Calivas industry advantage comes from its vertical integration and direct-to-consumer platform. But in consumer cases involving situations where agreements do control, such as in theEazecase, businesses should give serious thought not only to the content of dispute resolution provisions, but also to the choice of law or venue provisions. No further entries will be made on this case. SAGoldberg@duanemorris.com, Justin M. L. Stern Left Coast claims that Bills Nursery reneged on the agreement and filed suit. Another Federal Court Abstains From Hearing A Cannabis Dispute The court ultimately decided not to dismiss the suit but to abstain from deciding the issue because of the primacy of state law concerning the subject matter of the contract. The Sponsor and certain shareholders of Caliva and Left Coast Ventures will also receive certain customary registration rights after the expiration of such lock-up periods. This press release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities legislation which reflects SCACs current expectations regarding future events. Headquartered in Santa Rosa, CA, Left Coast Ventures is a diversified cannabis and hemp company specializing in cultivation, extraction, manufacturing, brand development, and distribution. Subversive Capital opted to purchase both Left Coast and Caliva for $142.2 million and $282.9 million, respectively. Cannabis laws vary from state to state. Sisu members will receive consideration in the form of $15.0 million in cash and the remainder in newly issued SCAC Common Shares, subject to exceptions for certain U.S. persons that will receive consideration in cash. Calivas commitment to compliance and quality reinforce its position as THE MOST TRUSTED NAME IN CANNABIS. Plaintiffs have successfully alleged [that] an improper side transaction intertwined with the merger rendered the merger itself unfair, Zurn wrote. Left Coast Ventures Under the terms of the OG Enterprises Agreement, upon closing of the OG Enterprises Transaction the affiliate of Mr. Carter will receive 5.0 million SCAC Common Shares and will have the contingent right to receive up to an additional 1.0 million SCAC Common Shares post-closing in the event the VWAP of SCAC Common Shares reaches $13.00, $17.00 and $21.00 within three years of closing (with one-third of such shares delivered at each such price threshold). Who is Left Coast Ventures Headquarters 7935 SW Nyberg St, Tualatin, Oregon, 97062, United States Phone Number (707) 757-7880 Website www.leftcoastventures.us Revenue $9.8M Industry Finance General Finance Is this data correct? 2:18-CV-01434-RAJ, 2019 WL 4058970, at *2 (W.D. Because it found the Federal Arbitration Act applied and the contract required arbitration of gatekeeping issues of arbitrability, the court found in favor of Eaze, requiring arbitration under the contract even though it simultaneously found the agreement itself was unenforceable on the grounds its object was unlawful. PLANT LIFE APOTHECARY LLC ET AL VS LEFT COAST Law360 takes your privacy seriously. Consequently, lawsuits may be more challenging for litigants, and thus potentially more disruptive and costly. For more information, visit www.subversivecapital.com. - Steve Allan as CEO 2017-11-14, Los Angeles County Superior Courts | Labor | Visionary Officer of new cannabis 2:20-CV-05263 | 2020-06-12, U.S. Courts Of Appeals | Contract |
Difference Between Riser And Runner In Casting, Articles L
left coast ventures lawsuit 2023